May 5, 2009
Volokh on Judicial Interpretation, An Unexamined Consistency May Be Individually Suboptimal
 |
By: Luke Gilman | Other Posts by Luke Gilman Go to Comments | Be the First to Comment |
Sasha Volokh ends Choosing Interpretive Methods: A Positive Theory of Judges and Everyone Else with this remarkable line:
I do not suggest that a foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds, but, as an economist, I suggest (less eloquently) that an unexamined consistency may be individually suboptimal.
We were fortunate enough to have Prof. Volokh at the University of Houston Law Center this past year. The rest of the paper is well worth discussion but exams loom. It’s published in the Legal Workshop, a new site that’s off to an auspicious start, featuring op-ed versions of the articles published by the member law journals.
Related posts:
- David Dow: Judicial Activism Makes America Great A new book from David Dow: America’s Prophets: How...
- The Summer Before Law School, Reading Lists The UH Law Center posts a recommended reading book list...
- The Situation of Law Reviews: May You Cite Check in Interesting Times The paid circulation for Law Reviews has been going the...
- 1L Required Reading: Orin Kerr’s How to Read a Case For any law student, but especially a 1L there is...
Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.