: The Blawgraphy
Life of a Law Student, University of Houston Law Center

Please note: I'm no longer updating this particular blog, but keep it around for archival purposes. Visit me at the current blog at

As if I didn’t hear enough about that damn McDonald’s Hot Coffee Case

Jury awards $122,400 for bite from sister’s cat

Interesting Economic Research, Race, Poverty and American Tort Awards

Another post on a great piece from Marginal Revolution, Alex Tabarrok discusses his recent research with Eric Helland on Race, Poverty and American Tort Awards. His conclusion:

A 1% increase in black poverty rates, for example, can increase tort awards by 3-10 percent with a similar increase in Hispanic poverty rates. Careful forum shopping can easily raise awards by 50-100%.

This is hardly a ground-breaking revelation of course. When I was in Beaumont, TX a few years ago, the person I was with told me the house we were going to was on ‘lawyer’s row’ an upper-income street where most of the homes were owned by plaintiff’s attorneys. For the uninitiated, Beaumont is in East Texas, where juries are much more likely to be rural and poor, and has a well-earned reputation as being a ‘judicial hellhole’ for corporate defendants. (See Overlawyered, for instance)

The post concludes with some rather damning comments made by Anthony Buzbee, a plaintiff’s attorney, in reference to Starr County in Texas.

“That venue probably adds about seventy-five percent to the value of the case,” he said. “You’ve got an injured Hispanic client, you’ve got a completely Hispanic jury, and you’ve got an Hispanic judge. All right. That’s how it is.”

In other parts of Texas, Buzbee went on, a plaintiff may have the burden of showing “here’s what the company did wrong, all right? But when you’re in Starr County, traditionally, you need to just show that the guy was working, and he was hurt. And that’s the hurdle: Just prove that he wasn’t hurt at Wal-Mart, buying something on his off time, and traditionally, you win those cases.”

To the extent that forum-shopping results in an arbitrary award of damages for plaintiffs and undermines faith in the fairness of our courts, it is rightly to be discouraged and ameliorated. However, to an equal extent, isn’t this just judicial democracy? Aren’t we in danger of undermining the traditional role of juries when we restrict their ability reflect the social mores of the society in which they live? Not all juries are created equally. Perhaps this is just my federalist stripes showing, but I fail to see anything egregiously unjust in juries in Beaumont giving plaintiffs higher awards than I would with juries in River Oaks, the ultra-wealthy, largely conservative Republican neighborhood in Houston, giving lower awards.

Legal Consequences of Trans Fats

I heard a tort-reform advocate spouting off about lawsuits built on obesity and couldn’t understand what why he was harping on it. Could Supersize Me have scared him that badly? Now it’s starting to make a little more sense.

CS Monitor: Lead paint, cigarettes: Are trans fats next?

In Pelman v. McDonald’s Corp., 237 F. Supp. 2d 512 (S.D.N.Y., Apr. 7, 2003), the court held that “legal consequences should not attach to the consumption of hamburgers and other fast food fare unless consumers are unaware of the dangers of eating such food.” I don’t know about you, but I don’t know Trans fats from Fats Domino, and can’t lend an informed opinion as to whether or not it’s as bad for one’s health as is suggested by some. If true, however, the addition of preservatives to which most ordinary people would be oblivious seems precisely the kind of thing court’s rule would allow.

Anyone care to enlighten me on the validity of the health impact of trans fat consumption one way or the other?

Blawgraphy: Subscribe by Email

Enter your email address:

Delivered by FeedBurner